BankBryanCave.com

Bank Bryan Cave

Commercial Litigation

Main Content

California Court Rejects “Sham Guarantee” Defense

October 13, 2016

Authors

Bryan Cave

California Court Rejects “Sham Guarantee” Defense

October 13, 2016

by: Bryan Cave

Bryan Cave LLP recently served as counsel for amicus curiae California Bankers Association (“CBA”) and helped score a victory in an important California appellate case of great interest to the banking industry,  LSREF2 Clover Property 4 LLC v. Festival Retail Fund 1 357 N. Beverly Drive LP (Second District, California Court of Appeal case number B259937).

The trial court had ruled that the guarantor of a commercial loan was excused from performance on the grounds that the guaranty was a “sham,” structured by the lender to circumvent California’s anti-deficiency laws.  The guarantor essentially argued that there was no legal separation between it and the borrower because it was the borrower’s “alter ego,” and as support they identified evidence that the two entities failed to observe basic corporate formalities.  According to the guarantor, it should be excused from its obligations because it was essentially the same as the borrower, and

Read More

July 2014 Client Alerts

July 31, 2014

Authors

Bryan Cave

July 2014 Client Alerts

July 31, 2014

by: Bryan Cave

Practice groups throughout Bryan Cave often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends. Listed below are the Client Alerts published in July 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

Good News for In-House Counsel:  The D.C. Circuit Court Restores Attorney-Client Privilege for Internal Investigations, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement and Government Contracts practice groups on July 2, 2014.

Federal Antitrust Laws:  A New Tool to Prohibit Pre-Petition Coordination Among Creditors?published by the Bankruptcy, Restructuring and Creditors’ Rights group on July 14, 2014.

No More Blurred Lines?  Federal Courts Rule That Conditional Discovery Objects are No Longer Proper Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, published by the Commercial Litigation practice group on July 30, 2014.

Fraud Outweighs Fairness:  Government Contractor Cannot Recover the Value of Its Services, published by the White Collar

Read More

June 2014 Client Alerts

June 30, 2014

Authors

Bryan Cave

June 2014 Client Alerts

June 30, 2014

by: Bryan Cave

Practice groups throughout Bryan Cave often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends. Listed below are the Client Alerts published in June 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

Supreme Court Holds Bare Allegation of Improper Purpose Does Not Entitle a Taxpayer to Examine IRS Officials, published by the Tax Advice and Controversy practice group on June 20, 2014.

District Judge Expands the Reach of Dodd Frank Retaliation Protections, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement, Labor and Employment, Broker-Dealer Litigation, Arbitration and Regulatory practice groups on June 3, 2014.

Breaking News:  Second Circuit Reverses Rakoff Decision Rejecting SEC Settlement, Holds That Requiring Admissions was Abuse of Discretion, published by the White Collar Defense and Investigations, Securities Litigation and Enforcement and Investment Management practice groups on June 4, 2014.

SEC Settles First Whistleblower

Read More

April 2014 Client Alerts

April 28, 2014

Authors

Bryan Cave

April 2014 Client Alerts

April 28, 2014

by: Bryan Cave

Practice groups throughout Bryan Cave often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends. Listed below are the Client Alerts published in April 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

 U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Test For Standing to Sue Under Federal False Advertising Statute And Rejects Test Used by Several Circuits to Prohibit Suits Brought By Non-Competitor Businesses, published by the Commercial Litigation, Intellectual Property and Trademarks practice groups on April 1, 2014.

The Australian Privacy Principles:  They don’t apply to me, do they?, published by the Data Privacy and Security team, April 1, 2014.

SEC Convenes Cybersecurity Roundtable:  Highlights Importance of Cybersecurity for Public Companies and Financial Market Participants, published by the Corporate Finance and Securities practice group and Data Privacy and Security Team, April 4, 2014.

Now It Gets Personal:  Department of Justice Obtains its First

Read More

January 2014 – Bryan Cave Client Alerts

February 14, 2014

Authors

Bryan Cave

January 2014 – Bryan Cave Client Alerts

February 14, 2014

by: Bryan Cave

Client service groups throughout Bryan Cave LLP often prepare alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends.  Listed below are the client alerts published in January, 2014.  Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

Qualified Plan Limits, published by Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, January 21, 2014

California “Do-Not-Track” Law Has Gone Into Effect, Requiring Some Websites to Revise Privacy Policy, published by the Data Privacy and Security Team, January 9, 2014

Federal Trade Commission Increases Interlocking Directorates Thresholds, published by Antitrust and Competition, January 24, 2014

Eleventh Circuit Holds that Affiliates of Indicted Contractor May Be Suspended from Government Contracting Indefinitely, Despite No Wrongdoing, published by Government Contracts, January 3, 2014

‘Single Asset Real Estate’:  A Concept in Need of Redefinition, published by Bankruptcy, Restructuring and Creditors’ Rights, January 15, 2014

Tax Court

Read More

December 2013 – Bryan Cave Client Alerts

December 31, 2013

Authors

Bryan Cave

December 2013 – Bryan Cave Client Alerts

December 31, 2013

by: Bryan Cave

Client Service Groups across the Firm often prepare Alerts on issues of interest to our clients and friends.  Listed below are the Alerts published in December, 2013.   Please click on the title to read the full text of the Alert.

New SEC Guidance on Bad Actor Rules, published by the Fund Formation Team, December 20, 2013

IRS Issues New Guidance on In-Plan Roth Rollovers, published by Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation, December 18, 2013

Tips and Traps for Taking Current Year Deductions for Bonus Programs Fixed by End of Year, published by Tax Advice and Controversy, December 20, 2013

Tax News and Developments – Fall 2013, published by Tax Advice and Controversy, December 20, 2013

IRS Publishes Proposed Regulations Determining Partner’s Share of Recourse Liabilities, published by Tax Advice and Controversy, December 26, 2013

Supreme Court Clarifies Law on Forum Selection Clauses:  Choice of Forum in Contract

Read More

11th Circuit Upholds Deposit Agreement Arbitration Provision

May 2, 2012

Authors

Jerry Blanchard

11th Circuit Upholds Deposit Agreement Arbitration Provision

May 2, 2012

by: Jerry Blanchard

The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit rendered an important decision on March 5, 2012, addressing the enforceability of binding arbitration provisions in consumer deposit agreements. The case began when Lawrence and Pamela Hough brought suit against Regions Bank for allegedly violating federal and state law by collecting overdraft charges under its deposit agreement. The deposit agreement contained an arbitration provision and Regions moved to compel arbitration. The federal district court hearing the case denied the motion to compel on the ground that the arbitration clause was substantively unconscionable because it contained a class action waiver. Regions appealed the decision to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals and the appellate court vacated the ruling and sent it back to the trial court in light of a recent United States Supreme Court which held that the Federal Arbitration Act preempted a California’s judicial rule regarding the unconscionability

Read More

March 2012 Client Alerts

April 24, 2012

Authors

Bryan Cave

March 2012 Client Alerts

April 24, 2012

by: Bryan Cave

9th Circuit Holds TILA Bars Rescission Suits Filed More Than 3 Years After Consummation

In McOmie-Gray v. Bank of America (9th Cir. Feb. 8, 2012), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that under the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”), “rescission suits must be brought within three years from consummation of the loan, regardless whether notice of rescission is delivered within that three-year period.”  It ruled that the three year period in the Act is an absolute limitation on rescission actions and that the one year period for bringing claims applies only to damages actions and does not extend the time to file a claim for rescission even where the borrower has sent the Bank a written notice of rescission within three years of loan signing or “consummation.”  To learn more about the facts in this case and the Court’s decision, please click here to read the Alert published by the

Read More

New Legislation Introduced on ATM Notices

April 20, 2012

Authors

Bill Custer and Jennifer Dempsey

New Legislation Introduced on ATM Notices

April 20, 2012

by: Bill Custer and Jennifer Dempsey

Legislation has been introduced in the United States House of Representatives that, if passed, would relieve banks of the responsibility of installing and monitoring the presence of physical notices on their ATMs notifying customers about the imposition of ATM transaction fees.

On April 17, 2012, Representatives Blaine Luetkemeyer (R-MO) and David Scott (D-GA) introduced H.R. 4367 which seeks to amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act to limit the fee disclosure requirement for operators of ATMs to the electronic notice alone. The electronic notice allows a consumer to choose whether the consumer wishes to continue with the ATM transaction and pay the fee or exit the transaction.  This proposed bill comes in the wake of class action litigation filed against banks and other ATM operators nationwide (and most recently against several Georgia community banks) alleging that the banks failed to post or maintain the physical notice on their ATMs.

As

Read More

Class Actions Filed Against Four Georgia Banks Over ATM Physical Fee Disclosure

March 15, 2012

Authors

Bill Custer and Jennifer Dempsey

Class Actions Filed Against Four Georgia Banks Over ATM Physical Fee Disclosure

March 15, 2012

by: Bill Custer and Jennifer Dempsey

Four class action complaints have been filed in the last two weeks against four different Georgia community banks alleging that the banks have violated the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.  The complaints were filed in the federal courts and all allege that the banks imposed fees on consumers who withdrew cash from the bank’s ATMs and that the banks allegedly failed to post a physical notice on the ATMs that a fee would be imposed for such services.

The Electronic Fund Transfer Act requires both a physical notice at or on the ATM in addition to the electronic notice the customer receives on the computer screen when making the withdrawal.  There are statutory penalties for a failure to comply with the Act.   While there is no minimum penalty proscribed for a class action, the statute provides that in a successful class action, plaintiffs may recover up to “the lesser of $500,000

Read More
The attorneys of Bryan Cave LLP make this site available to you only for the educational purposes of imparting general information and a general understanding of the law. This site does not offer specific legal advice. Your use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Bryan Cave LLP or any of its attorneys. Do not use this site as a substitute for specific legal advice from a licensed attorney. Much of the information on this site is based upon preliminary discussions in the absence of definitive advice or policy statements and therefore may change as soon as more definitive advice is available. Please review our full disclaimer.