Another court has weighed in on the question of whether the FDIC can sue former directors and officers of failed banks for ordinary negligence. The latest decision comes from a federal court in Maryland, which held that a gross negligence standard must be applied when evaluating the conduct of directors and officers under Maryland’s business judgment rule. FDIC v. Arthur, Civil Action No. RDB-14-604 (D. Md. Mar. 2, 2015).
The facts of FDIC v. Arthur follow a now-familiar pattern. Baltimore-based Bradford Bank failed on August 28, 2009 and the FDIC was appointed as its receiver. The four defendants are the bank’s former president, a senior loan officer and two directors who served on the bank’s loan committee. The FDIC alleged that the defendants were negligent, grossly negligent and breached their fiduciary duties to the bank in connection with seven commercial loan transactions, resulting in losses in excess of $7Read More